<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: American Theocracy divorces US Constitution, promotes terrorism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truthhugger.com/2010/01/21/american-theocracy-divorces-the-us-constitution-promotes-terrorism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truthhugger.com/2010/01/21/american-theocracy-divorces-the-us-constitution-promotes-terrorism/</link>
	<description>Question with boldness, education, philosophy, humanity, culture, religion, social science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward McCartney</title>
		<link>http://truthhugger.com/2010/01/21/american-theocracy-divorces-the-us-constitution-promotes-terrorism/#comment-2620</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward McCartney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 18:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truthhugger.com/?p=5485#comment-2620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article was written with an apparent implication that certain words mean certain things, that are probably based on some bad decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Although the word, religion, has been used broadly, it has not always been used that broadly. Some history indicates it to be used to mean, Christianity, if not more, in the constitution. If I&#039;m right about that, the two (2) clauses of religion could be taken to mean the following sentence.

The United States&#039; legislature may not legislate to favour any denomination of Christianity, [more than any other Christian denomination] mor may the congress make any law to stop the unrestricted practise of Christianity.

Regarding the word, religious, of article VI, history can help again, such as Martyrs Mirror by Thieleman J. van Braght. When some doctrinal tests were given by Catholics to Christians in preamerican Europe, it was done to test in such a way that to day some might call those denominational tests. Of course it is right to test to wit whether a person is a Christian or not: otherwise we could have gotten what we got, which is somewhat atheistic politicians that meaningfully ignore God, and promote the toleration of sin.

If you would learn a bit of history of America before the United States&#039; constitution, you may begin to listen to a series of messages about biblical law v. Constitutionalism beginning with T-742, which can be found on the following internet page. (I have heard through T-767.)

http://www.missiontoisrael.org/tapelist.php

Regarding terror, it can occur when a people disobey God according to Leviticus 26.

Thanks.

Edward McCartney
April 9, 2010]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article was written with an apparent implication that certain words mean certain things, that are probably based on some bad decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States.</p>
<p>Although the word, religion, has been used broadly, it has not always been used that broadly. Some history indicates it to be used to mean, Christianity, if not more, in the constitution. If I&#8217;m right about that, the two (2) clauses of religion could be taken to mean the following sentence.</p>
<p>The United States&#8217; legislature may not legislate to favour any denomination of Christianity, [more than any other Christian denomination] mor may the congress make any law to stop the unrestricted practise of Christianity.</p>
<p>Regarding the word, religious, of article VI, history can help again, such as Martyrs Mirror by Thieleman J. van Braght. When some doctrinal tests were given by Catholics to Christians in preamerican Europe, it was done to test in such a way that to day some might call those denominational tests. Of course it is right to test to wit whether a person is a Christian or not: otherwise we could have gotten what we got, which is somewhat atheistic politicians that meaningfully ignore God, and promote the toleration of sin.</p>
<p>If you would learn a bit of history of America before the United States&#8217; constitution, you may begin to listen to a series of messages about biblical law v. Constitutionalism beginning with T-742, which can be found on the following internet page. (I have heard through T-767.)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.missiontoisrael.org/tapelist.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.missiontoisrael.org/tapelist.php</a></p>
<p>Regarding terror, it can occur when a people disobey God according to Leviticus 26.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Edward McCartney<br />
April 9, 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Progressive Alliance Weekly Round Up &#171; TexasVox: The Voice of Public Citizen in Texas</title>
		<link>http://truthhugger.com/2010/01/21/american-theocracy-divorces-the-us-constitution-promotes-terrorism/#comment-2582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Progressive Alliance Weekly Round Up &#171; TexasVox: The Voice of Public Citizen in Texas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truthhugger.com/?p=5485#comment-2582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] BossKitty at TruthHugger is continually amazed at general ignorance concerning the actual words in the US Constitution. Interpretations abound from the mouths of people who have never read the document, or do not comprehend the words in context. Embellishments and fantasy surrounding this document are spoken every day. What is especially disturbing is how these fantasies infiltrate America&#8217;s politics. To be elected in some regions, a politician must fertilize the fantasy. Perspective must return to how Americans regard the Law of the Land.  American Theocracy divorces US Constitution, promotes terrorism. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BossKitty at TruthHugger is continually amazed at general ignorance concerning the actual words in the US Constitution. Interpretations abound from the mouths of people who have never read the document, or do not comprehend the words in context. Embellishments and fantasy surrounding this document are spoken every day. What is especially disturbing is how these fantasies infiltrate America&#8217;s politics. To be elected in some regions, a politician must fertilize the fantasy. Perspective must return to how Americans regard the Law of the Land.  American Theocracy divorces US Constitution, promotes terrorism. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Progressive Alliance Weekly Round Up &#171; Doing My Part for the Left</title>
		<link>http://truthhugger.com/2010/01/21/american-theocracy-divorces-the-us-constitution-promotes-terrorism/#comment-2581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Progressive Alliance Weekly Round Up &#171; Doing My Part for the Left]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truthhugger.com/?p=5485#comment-2581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] BossKitty at TruthHugger is continually amazed at general ignorance concerning the actual words in the US Constitution. Interpretations abound from the mouths of people who have never read the document, or do not comprehend the words in context. Embellishments and fantasy surrounding this document are spoken every day. What is especially disturbing is how these fantasies infiltrate America&#8217;s politics. To be elected in some regions, a politician must fertilize the fantasy. Perspective must return to how Americans regard the Law of the Land.  American Theocracy divorces US Constitution, promotes terrorism. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BossKitty at TruthHugger is continually amazed at general ignorance concerning the actual words in the US Constitution. Interpretations abound from the mouths of people who have never read the document, or do not comprehend the words in context. Embellishments and fantasy surrounding this document are spoken every day. What is especially disturbing is how these fantasies infiltrate America&#8217;s politics. To be elected in some regions, a politician must fertilize the fantasy. Perspective must return to how Americans regard the Law of the Land.  American Theocracy divorces US Constitution, promotes terrorism. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
