<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Have One Twisted Health System, Living Organ Donors Beware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truthhugger.com/2009/11/01/we-have-one-twisted-health-system-living-organ-donors-beware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truthhugger.com/2009/11/01/we-have-one-twisted-health-system-living-organ-donors-beware/</link>
	<description>Question with boldness, education, philosophy, humanity, culture, religion, social science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: livingdonor101</title>
		<link>http://truthhugger.com/2009/11/01/we-have-one-twisted-health-system-living-organ-donors-beware/#comment-2429</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[livingdonor101]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truthhugger.com/?p=5147#comment-2429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 1972 Social Security Act, Section 1881 (42 USC 139 rr) established a benefit for living donors. In 1974, the director of SSA issued a memo to all transplant centers that donor expenses were to be billed to the recipient&#039;s insurance - IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW. 

Transplant centers happily complied with this edict; private insurance companies provide larger reimbursements than Medicare. Congress has been informed for this issue multiple times, but it saves Medicare money, so they&#039;ve done nothing. 

ACOT&#039;s recommendations are just that - non-enforcable suggestions. Transplant centers have discretion over exactly what they include in their informed consent process and it never includes the real physiological and psychological risks of living donation (http://www.livingdonor101.com/risks.shtml). 

The media perpetrates the propoganda that living donation is perfectly safe when we have NO comprehensive long-term data on donors at all. UNOS admits they lose 40% of living donors with-in six months, and the number dwindle from there. The medical community has resisted every effort to implement a living donor registry (even though one exists for recipients, so who do they prioritize?) because they fear it will reveal the truth and they&#039;ll have to find another way to line their pockets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 1972 Social Security Act, Section 1881 (42 USC 139 rr) established a benefit for living donors. In 1974, the director of SSA issued a memo to all transplant centers that donor expenses were to be billed to the recipient&#8217;s insurance &#8211; IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW. </p>
<p>Transplant centers happily complied with this edict; private insurance companies provide larger reimbursements than Medicare. Congress has been informed for this issue multiple times, but it saves Medicare money, so they&#8217;ve done nothing. </p>
<p>ACOT&#8217;s recommendations are just that &#8211; non-enforcable suggestions. Transplant centers have discretion over exactly what they include in their informed consent process and it never includes the real physiological and psychological risks of living donation (<a href="http://www.livingdonor101.com/risks.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.livingdonor101.com/risks.shtml</a>). </p>
<p>The media perpetrates the propoganda that living donation is perfectly safe when we have NO comprehensive long-term data on donors at all. UNOS admits they lose 40% of living donors with-in six months, and the number dwindle from there. The medical community has resisted every effort to implement a living donor registry (even though one exists for recipients, so who do they prioritize?) because they fear it will reveal the truth and they&#8217;ll have to find another way to line their pockets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: organ donor &#124; organ donor</title>
		<link>http://truthhugger.com/2009/11/01/we-have-one-twisted-health-system-living-organ-donors-beware/#comment-2428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[organ donor &#124; organ donor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truthhugger.com/?p=5147#comment-2428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to create a surge in donations, but should succeed in discouraging organ trading.http://breaking.sgWe Have One Twisted Health System, Living Organ Donors Beware &#8230;The organ donor&#039;s family is never charged for donating. The family is charged for the cost of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to create a surge in donations, but should succeed in discouraging organ trading.<a href="http://breaking.sgWe" rel="nofollow">http://breaking.sgWe</a> Have One Twisted Health System, Living Organ Donors Beware &#8230;The organ donor&#39;s family is never charged for donating. The family is charged for the cost of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

