<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zakaria, Voice Of Insight Missing In Most Americans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truthhugger.com/2009/06/22/zakaria-voice-of-insight-missing-in-most-americans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truthhugger.com/2009/06/22/zakaria-voice-of-insight-missing-in-most-americans/</link>
	<description>Question with boldness, education, philosophy, humanity, culture, religion, social science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bosskitty</title>
		<link>http://truthhugger.com/2009/06/22/zakaria-voice-of-insight-missing-in-most-americans/#comment-2283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bosskitty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truthhugger.com/?p=4904#comment-2283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree Wil, Zakaria chooses his words so carefully that both sides of an argument can grasp the essence of what he&#039;s saying.  I may be reading more into him than there really is, but I see he offers palatable grains of insight that could nudge radicals closer to the middle of the international debate.  As long as he portrays sterile diagnostics, he appears sincerely non-partisan.  He is not a knee jerk, that&#039;s why I appreciate his views.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Wil, Zakaria chooses his words so carefully that both sides of an argument can grasp the essence of what he&#8217;s saying.  I may be reading more into him than there really is, but I see he offers palatable grains of insight that could nudge radicals closer to the middle of the international debate.  As long as he portrays sterile diagnostics, he appears sincerely non-partisan.  He is not a knee jerk, that&#8217;s why I appreciate his views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil Robinson</title>
		<link>http://truthhugger.com/2009/06/22/zakaria-voice-of-insight-missing-in-most-americans/#comment-2282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wil Robinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truthhugger.com/?p=4904#comment-2282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m torn on Zakaria - sometimes he seems very astute, and other times he sounds very neo-conesque.  Still, his views can&#039;t help but stimulate good debate.

I think the idea of &quot;rigged&quot; elections is now moot.  Which means Obama can now come out more forcefully in support of freedom of speech, expression, since he&#039;s not saying &quot;hold new elections,&quot; but &quot;stop violating human rights.&quot;

If the US goes around (a week ago) and publicly supports the protesters (as many republicans wanted us to do), we would appear to be &quot;interfering.&quot;

But now, Obama can come out and condemn the crackdown purely on a human rights platform - the stolen/rigged/whatever election doesn&#039;t matter anymore.  

The regime is shooting itself in the foot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m torn on Zakaria &#8211; sometimes he seems very astute, and other times he sounds very neo-conesque.  Still, his views can&#8217;t help but stimulate good debate.</p>
<p>I think the idea of &#8220;rigged&#8221; elections is now moot.  Which means Obama can now come out more forcefully in support of freedom of speech, expression, since he&#8217;s not saying &#8220;hold new elections,&#8221; but &#8220;stop violating human rights.&#8221;</p>
<p>If the US goes around (a week ago) and publicly supports the protesters (as many republicans wanted us to do), we would appear to be &#8220;interfering.&#8221;</p>
<p>But now, Obama can come out and condemn the crackdown purely on a human rights platform &#8211; the stolen/rigged/whatever election doesn&#8217;t matter anymore.  </p>
<p>The regime is shooting itself in the foot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

