Skip to content

Darfur: Grief Useless, Rhetoric Empty, Nothing Changed

May 13, 2008

Q&A: History of Sudan’s Darfur conflict

The United Nations Security Council has approved a 26,000-strong peacekeeping force to replace the 7,000 African Union (AU) observer mission struggling to protect civilians in Sudan’s western province of Darfur.

   The exact make-up and deployment date for this beefed up force is still to be determined.

In the meantime, more than 2m people are living in camps after fleeing more than four years of fighting in the region and they are vulnerable without peacekeepers.

Sudan’s government and the pro-government Arab militias are accused of war crimes against the region’s black African population, although the UN has stopped short of calling it genocide.

Peace talks involving the government and most of the myriad rebel groups have recently resumed, but until the new UN-AU force deploys in Darfur the prospects for an end to violence look remote.

How did the conflict start?

The conflict began in the arid and impoverished region early in 2003 after a rebel group began attacking government targets, saying the region was being neglected by Khartoum.

The rebels say the government is oppressing black Africans in favour of Arabs.

Darfur, which means land of the Fur, has faced many years of tension over land and grazing rights between the mostly nomadic Arabs, and farmers from the Fur, Massaleet and Zagawa communities.

There are two main rebel groups, the Sudan Liberation Army (SLA) and the Justice and Equality Movement (Jem), although both groups have split, some along ethnic lines.

More than a dozen rebel groups are now believed to exist. Most will attend the talks in Libya, but one key leader, Abdul Wahid el-Nur, is boycotting the talks until the conflict ends.

What is the government doing?

It admits mobilising “self-defence militias” following rebel attacks but denies any links to the Janjaweed, accused of trying to “cleanse” black Africans from large swathes of territory.

Refugees from Darfur say that following air raids by government aircraft, the Janjaweed ride into villages on horses and camels, slaughtering men, raping women and stealing whatever they can find.

Many women report being abducted by the Janjaweed and held as sex slaves for more than a week before being released.

The US and some human rights groups say that genocide is taking place – though a UN investigation team sent to Sudan said that while war crimes had been committed, there had been no intent to commit genocide.

Sudan’s government denies being in control of the Janjaweed and President Omar al-Bashir has called them “thieves and gangsters”.

After strong international pressure and the threat of sanctions, the government promised to disarm the Janjaweed. But so far there is little evidence this has happened.

Trials have been announced in Khartoum of some members of the security forces suspected of abuses – but this is viewed as part of a campaign against UN-backed attempts to get some 50 key suspects tried at the International Criminal Court in The Hague.

What has happened to Darfur’s civilians?

Millions have fled their destroyed villages, with some 2m in camps near Darfur’s main towns. But there is not enough food, water or medicine.

The Janjaweed patrol outside the camps and Darfuris say the men are killed and the women raped if they venture too far in search of firewood or water.

Some 200,000 have also sought safety in neighbouring Chad, but many of these are camped along a 600km stretch of the border and remain vulnerable to attacks from Sudan.

The refugees are also threatened by the diplomatic fallout between Chad and Sudan as the neighbours accuse one another of supporting each other’s rebel groups.

Chad’s eastern areas have a similar ethnic make-up to Darfur.

Many aid agencies are working in Darfur but they are unable to get access to vast areas because of the fighting.

How many have died?

With much of Darfur inaccessible to aid workers and researchers, calculating how many deaths there have been in the past three years is impossible.

What researchers have done is to estimate the deaths based on surveys in areas they can reach.

The latest research published in September 2006 in the journal Science puts the numbers of deaths above and beyond those that would normally die in this inhospitable area at “no fewer than 200,000″.

The US researchers say that their figures are the most compelling and persuasive estimate to date. They have made no distinction between those dying as a result of violence and those dying as a result of starvation or disease in refugee camps.

Accurate figures are crucial in determining whether the deaths in Darfur are genocide or – as the Sudanese government says – the situation is being exaggerated.

Have there been previous peace talks?  Lots.

KEY REBEL PLAYERS

SLM:   Minni Minnawi’s faction signed 2006 peace deal

SLM: Abdul Wahid Mohammad Ahmed al-Nur’s faction rejected peace deal

Jem: Khalil Ibrahim, one of the first rebel groups, rejected deal

Rebel negotiator: Suleiman Jamous

SLM Unity:Abdallah Yehia

UFLD: recently formed umbrella group including SLM commanders

Breakaway SLM commanders: Mahjoub Hussein, Jar el-Neby and Suleiman Marajan

There are estimated to be more than 13 rebel factions in Darfur

The leader of one SLA faction, Minni Minawi, who signed a peace deal in 2006 after long-running talks in Nigeria, was given a large budget, but his fighters have already been accused by Amnesty International of abuses against people in areas opposed to the peace deal.

The other rebel factions did not sign the deal.

There has been a dramatic increase in violence and displacement since the deal was signed.

Amid international threats of sanctions for those refusing to attend, many rebel groups briefly attended preliminary talks with the government in Libya in October 2007 – but there is little hope of a quick breakthrough.

Is anyone trying to stop the fighting?

About 7,000 African Union troops are deployed in Darfur on a very limited mandate.

Experts say the soldiers are too few to cover an area the size of France, and the African Union says it does not have the money to fund the operation for much longer.

The recent killing of 10 AU soldiers by a rebel group in northern Darfur has highlighted the need for the new force to be deployed – but at the same time makes it harder for the AU and UN to secure pledges of troops.

The new, larger joint UN-AU force should be in place by early 2008 – if international support is forthcoming – and be better equipped and with a stronger mandate to protect civilians and aid workers.

But until recently, Sudan resisted strong Western diplomatic pressure for the UN to take control of the peacekeeping mission and their attitude to the deployment and its mandate remains ambiguous at best.

Some say even this new 26,000 force will not be enough to cover such a large, remote area.

Others point out that peacekeepers cannot do much unless there is a peace to keep.

They say the fighting can only end through a deal agreed by all sides, which has yet to materialise.

Report: Some 300 rebels captured in Sudanese army fighting with …

Chad denies involvement in Sudan’s Darfur rebel attack on capital …

Sudan cuts ties with Chad after rebel attack on Khartoum

Full coverage »

A look at Sudan’s Darfur conflict

A look at the rebels who moved on the Sudanese capital of Khartoum on Saturday, and the underlying conflict in the Darfur region:

CONFLICT:

More than 200,000 people have died since ethnic African tribes rebelled in February 2003 after years of neglect by the Arab-dominated government in Khartoum. The government responded with a military campaign in which pro-government Arab militia, the janjaweed, are alleged to have committed widespread atrocities.

PLAYERS:

_ Sudan’s government: President Omar al-Bashir last year agreed under heavy international pressure to a hybrid United Nations-African Union force to replace the small and poorly equipped A.U. force. Human rights and humanitarian groups allege the government has launched military offensives and failed to disarm the janjaweed. Rebels also accuse the government of stonewalling on the deployment of the peacekeeping force, which has insufficient personnel and equipment.

_ Justice and Equality Movement: Led by Khalil Ibrahim, a veteran politician, the JEM has become the backbone of a rebel coalition that has repeatedly defeated government troops in northern Darfur. JEM calls for more autonomy for Darfur but not outright independence. Experts say the group’s military strength has been boosted by arms from Chad.

_ Other rebel factions: The Sudan Liberation Movement splintered into two main factions in November 2005 after a power struggle between leaders Abdelwahid Elnur and Minni Minnawi. Minnawi signed a peace deal with the Sudanese government in 2006 and is now an adviser to President Al-Bashir.

FORCES:

_ Sudanese Armed Forces: Believed to be more than 100,000.

_ Estimated size of both SLM and JEM: 10,000, according to Jane’s Information Group. The International Crisis Group puts the number at between 7,000 and 15,000, and some estimates put it much lower, around 1,200 to 2,000.

_ Janjaweed: Peaked at about 10,000, but figures fluctuate.

It takes celebrities to get the attention of a self-consumed world. Humanitarian disasters, man made or natural, are nightly news entertainment for westerners. Human suffering is described by how your boyfriend or girlfriend has mistreated you. It is a selfish world. Being disconnected from others is a way of life. Being disconnected from how the earth works allows us to ignore it warnings. In the US, people are consumed with the inconvenience of rising fuel prices, food prices and moan about their iPhones and toys. Loosing jobs, loosing their overpriced homes is their real tragedy. Feeling sympathy for their neighbors is common, doing something about it is left up to sacred charities that are loosing donations to economic downslides. Simplistic attitudes are the best anyone can expect from western society. “Why don’t they just elect someone else? Why don’t they just move somewhere else? Why is everyone picking on Britney Spears?

Celebrity humanitarians focused on Darfur:

Cross posted on Bluebloggin
6 Comments
  1. December 7, 2008 9:01 pm

    Madnino, I am very interested in following your project. I would like to follow your efforts, please send me updates. If you can send photos of the construction, tell me about Leer, maybe tell me short biographies of those helping you. I can start a series of articles. I would like to track your progress by writing articles.
    I’ll be watching your academy website, too.

  2. madnino permalink
    December 7, 2008 7:21 pm

    Bosskitty, I agree to all that you said but this is only one way that I will be helping the people of Sudan. I am also aware that there are families that needs the help too. I just feel that this is also a peaceful alternative to ending a war. I am not naive though, I know war can bring this school down in a second but I trust the peacekeepers there. By the way, the school will be built in Leer, Sudan.
    —-
    The Emma Academy Project
    will be building a school there in Sudan. To help build a school, we would have this cause. This School will be sheltering the children of Sudan from the effects of war in honor of Emma McCune.

  3. December 4, 2008 7:26 am

    Madnino, history is always the convenient excuse to perpetrate atrocity. History can be used by one faction to justify crimes against another faction … this is nothing more than revenge. A blood feud or vendetta is a long-running argument or fight between parties—often, through guilt by association, groups of people, especially families or clans. These are self perpetuating crimes.

    I agree that education is an important answer, but conditions must be safe and stable before education can happen. If your school can indeed protect these children, and they are not suffering from PTSD, you have contributed a great building block toward a solution. I do see your academy has a rehab center, but what about the families?

  4. madnino permalink
    December 3, 2008 10:53 pm

    It seems to me that the Darfuris really owns the land afterall… According to the history that I read, the Nomadic arabs entered into the territory of the Dafuris… If there has been an attack insighted by the nomadic arabs, then I could really say that there really is genocide since the attack was caused by intentions of driving the other race away to extinction. There really is no need of violence if we can only cooperate in such peace without conditions, both sides will be benefited. I really do think that greed has to play as a factor in this. Education is one such peaceful way to keep peace in the land of Sudan. I keep in mind that to place education there I help build a school also known as the Emma Academy Project . I visited the site and they happen to be building a school to protect the children of Sudan and to give them a bright future.

  5. Anonymous permalink
    October 22, 2008 9:27 am

    cool

  6. ravenscawl permalink
    May 14, 2008 5:16 pm

    “The US and some human rights groups say that genocide is taking place – though a UN investigation team sent to Sudan said that while war crimes had been committed, there had been no intent to commit genocide.”

    One might ask of what Nation(s) the U.N TEAM was made
    up of.Just to get their Definition of GENOCIDE!

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 40 other followers

%d bloggers like this: